Personal Statement On Real Life Employees - 1314 Words

There does not exist in this world a job in which conflict does not occur. It just isn’t a possibility. Even if you are a company of one working for yourself there still exists conflict. Conflict with customers, conflict with orders, conflict with banks; it doesn’t matter because conflict is unescapable. So dealing with it and minimizing it are priorities in any efficient organization. Over the course of this semester we have been indoctrinated in the various forms conflict presents itself as well as the strategies to resolve it. But how does this translate to real life employees in real life organizations? To find out I conducted an interview with two individuals from two different organizations to gain their perspective on these†¦show more content†¦Organizational structure and hierarchy for a base and the military as a whole can get pretty confusing so we will consider colleagues to be other members of his shop with the same job (although as we will s ee later conflict arises due to rank) and direct supervisors as anyone directly overseeing the shop. Number of colleagues for employee A would be about ten and direct supervisors would be 2-3. Employee B has four colleagues and one direct supervisor, but the tubing department has about 30 employees. Employee B’s responsibilities involve overseeing employees, settling scheduling disputes, and taking care of customer problems/complaints. Employee A’s responsibilities involve maintenance of aircraft, keeping up to date on applicable training, overseeing other members of shop lower in rank than himself, and keeping up with military standards. When asked what about their jobs keeps them motivated and what aspects inspired them, both of our employees where a bit caught off guard. After a moment of deliberation employee A told me that he enjoys the structure of the military. There are rules, guidelines, and directives to everything in the military. As we will see late r that can also be cause for conflict, but he told me that it is nice to always know what is required of him and it is no different for anyone else. He is also kept motivated by the fact that he is

Literary Device Compare and Contrast Essay Free Essays

Compare and Contrast Essay Short stories are often the best way to learn about literary terms and their uses. They’re short, as their name depicts, but contain everything that longer stories would have such as the elements of plot, foreshadowing, themes, tone, and other literary devices. The two short stories, The Parsley Garden by William Saroyan and Sweat by Zora Neale Hudson were both amazing to read and offered a lot of insight to American history. We will write a custom essay sample on Literary Device Compare and Contrast Essay or any similar topic only for you Order Now The Parsley Garden told the story of an adolescent, named Al, during the depression, who wanted a hammer he saw in a store. Not having a single penny on him, he decided to steal it, getting caught in the action. Lectured and humiliated by the store manager, Mr. Clemmer, he was let go resulting in him plotting his revenge and a way to get his pride back. Sweat was the story of an African-American wash-woman, Delia. She was constantly abused and was trapped under her tyrannical husband, Sykes who openly cheated on her with another woman. Despite all her hardships with her husband, she worked long and hard using her own sweat and blood to clean clothes. As their relationship got even worse, Sykes decided to pull an ugly prank on Delia that would later backfire on him. Both stories had their similarities and differences, but some stood out more than others. The climaxes of the two stories were similar in that they were both turning points in the story, but also different in the way the story was resolved. In Sweat, the resolution is bitter sweet. â€Å"She saw him on his hands and knees as soon as she reached the door†¦she knew the cold river was creeping up and up to extinguish that eye which must know by now that she knew. Delia was emancipated from the abuse of her husband, but she still pitied him and was upset over the death of her Sykes. The Parsley Garden ends in the more typical, happy fashion. Al finally obtains his hammer while regaining his pride. â€Å"His mother went inside and went to bed, but Al Condraj sat on the bench he had made and smelled the parsley garden and didn’t feel humiliated anymore. But not hing could stop him from hating the two men, even though he knew they hadn’t done anything they shouldn’t have†. The differences in the resolution of the two stories are common as resolutions are much more complicated than the fairytale ending these days. Each has its own unique touch but both resolved the story with the readers in peace. Themes are the morals of the story. Both stories had many themes; some similar, some completely different. In Sweat, some of the themes included oppression, honesty, and determination just to name a few. The Parsley Garden had a few more common ones such as coming of age, honesty, pride, and integrity. The theme that occurred most in Sweat was oppression as it was seen throughout the essay. It was the main theme unlike The Parsley Garden which didn’t have one main theme but many smaller themes spread out evenly. â€Å"She brought love to the union and he had brought a longing after the flesh. Two months after the wedding, he had given her the first brutal beating†. Quotes about Delia getting beat, reoccurred throughout the whole story, compared to The Parsley Garden, where the themes did not reoccur. One aspect of stories in general always intrigues me. The conflicts between the characters or between themselves is what makes up the story, so conflicts are one of the most important literary terms in a story. Both stories contain man vs. man conflict such as when Delia and Sykes fight â€Å"That night he did not return at all, and the next day being Sunday, Delia was glad she did not have to quarrel before she hitched up her pony and drove the four miles to Woodbridge†, and when Al was grabbed by the young man in the store â€Å"but as he did so a man took him firmly by the arm without a word and pushed him to the back of the store into a small office†. Man vs. man is often the most common type of conflict as there is usually a protagonist and an antagonist. The stories differed in that Sweat also had man vs. society, where it went against society, for Sykes to beat Delia as aforementioned with the theme, oppression. Sweat and The Parsley Garden were similar in many ways, but they also had more differences than similarities. This just shows the variety of stories there are out there in the world. Comparing two different stories would yield completely different ways of writing. There are just too many ways of writing, but one can bet one thing for sure. There will always be literary devices in a good story and it will always follow a plot. How to cite Literary Device Compare and Contrast Essay, Essays

Research on Employment Standards Code

Question: Discuss about the Research on Employment Standards Code. Answer: Introduction: This Act came into force in the year 1996. This Act was formed by the government of Alberta as these standards were importantly to be made for the betterment of the employees and the employers. These were formed for the purpose of installing the human and moral values into the working of the employees in Alberta. This Code was formed as a toolkit for the employers (Alberta, 2016). It was formed so that the employers could be held accountable as after the application of these laws, the statement of earnings is to be provided by each and every employer to the employees and therefore this is how the employees could be made aware about their rights. The main aim of the Alberta Employment Standards Code is to prescribe the main source of hour and also wage law. One of the recent amendments that have been made in this Code is the Employment Standards (Compassionate Care leave Act, 2012). This amendment has sought to make changes to the earlier code. It says that those employers that are regulated non-federally in Alberta would get the unpaid leave of about 8 weeks for the purpose of taking care of a family member who is terminally ill. The reason for this amendment was to provide for those employees that were the primary caregiver of the family members (GlobalWorkplaceInsider, 2013). This kind of relaxation in the laws was given for rendering support to the family of those employees who had been working for 52 consecutive weeks. Application of the Act Section 2 of this Act applies to each and every person who is an employer or an employee. Even the Crown is included in the same(Alberta, 2012). This Crown is in right of Alberta and also the employees of the same. There are however certain exceptions to this. There are certain people who are not included in this Act. Those employees and employers who are a member of the municipal police service that are appointed in accordance with the Police Act cannot be included under the purview of this Act. Also their employers could not be brought under the purview of this Act. The employers and the employees of those Acts which have expressly mentioned the fact that the present Act would not apply, would also not be included under this Act. There are some provisions that would even apply to these exempted categories. These provisions relate to the maternity or paternal leaves (Law for Alberta Women, 2015). Also, other provisions that are related to compassionate care and reservist leave would be granted to them. There are various regulations and divisions that are not available to the employees that have been employed on a farm and the people, whose employment is related, in a direct manner, to the production, of milk, eggs, fruits, livestock as defined by the Livestock Industry Diversification Act etc., at the primary level (Martinelli Lau, 2014). Those employees who do not work under the province or internationally, the employees under federal jurisdiction and the workers or contractors that are self-employed are also excluded from this Act. Purpose and Overview of the Act Purpose: The purpose of this Act is to establish the minimum standards for the employers and the employees working under the government of Alberta. These minimum standards pertain to the areas that include the number of hours of work, the leaves to be given for vacations, provision of wages and overtime. The main aim of these laws is to provide for the fairness and equality at the sites of the work. Also, greater benefits for employers and employees are given under this Act as the minimum standards have been set and therefore no person can try to opt out from the core standards in any manner whether direct or indirect(workershelp, 2017). Key Sections: The key sections of this Act include Section 2 which states about the application of this Act. Section 4 states about the minimum standards which have been set under this Act. Section 16-20 of this Act talk about the hours of work up till when the employees would have to work at the place of employment (Hoskin Dickie, 2006). Who is responsible: Both the Alberta employees and the employers have the liability to ensure that the provisions of this Act are being upheld and that these are being applied in a fair and an equitable manner. This kind of shared responsibility is important for the enforcement of the standards. Employment Related Situations First situation: Employee A who is made to work for 14 consecutive hours by his employee on the work days without any urgent work. Section to be applied- Section 16(1) would be applied to the present case (Macmillan, 2017). Application of the Section- This section of the Employment Standards Code seeks to state the fact that an employee under this Code could only work for 12 hours consecutively on a work day. Problems: If the provisions of this Act are not followed, then the penalties would be levied on that employer who has failed to pay heed to the provisions of this Act. Second Situation: Employer B is not given any leave, by his employer, even after working for two consecutive weeks. Also his employer do not provide for any pay periods. Section to be applied- In this case, Section 19 of the Employment Standards Code is to be applied. Section 7 would also be applicable to the present situation. Application of the Section- This section states that every employer is to mandatorily give his employee, one day rest in the whole week. For two consecutive weeks of work, the employee is entitled to 2 consecutive days of rest. For three consecutive weeks, there would be a week of 3 consecutive days. Section 7 states that each and every employer must provide a pay period to the employee. This would help in the calculation of the overtime pay and also the wages that are due to an employee and it should not be more than one work month. Problems- If the provisions of this Act are not followed then the employer would have to pay certain penalties. References Alberta. (2016). Employment Standards Tool Kit for Employers. Retrieved on January 17, 2017, from https://work.alberta.ca/, https://work.alberta.ca/documents/employment-standards-toolkit.pdf GlobalWorkplaceInsider. (2013). Upcoming amendments to Albertas employment standards legislation. Retrieved on January 17, 2017, from https://www.globalworkplaceinsider.com/, https://www.globalworkplaceinsider.com/2013/09/upcoming-amendments-to-albertas-employment-standards-legislation/ Government of Alberta. (2012, September 17). Employment Standards Code. Retrieved on January 17, 2017, from https://www.qp.alberta.ca/, https://www.qp.alberta.ca/1266.cfm?page=E09.cfmleg_type=Actsisbncln=9780779744015 Hoskin, O., Dickie, S. (2006). Employment labor in Alberta: Lexology navigator QA. Retrieved on January 17, 2017, from https://www.lexology.com/, https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=6c472d3d-569d-474e-ab1b-9e4c4c9f8b10 Law for Alberta Women. (2015). Employment Standards Code. Retrieved on January 17, 2017, from https://www.lawforalbertawomen.ca/, https://www.lawforalbertawomen.ca/women-and-work/employment-standards-code/ Macmillan, (2017). Employment law in Canada: Provincial and federal regulated employers Alberta, Available at: https://www.mcmillan.ca/files/Employment%20Law%20in%20Alberta%20FINAL.pdf [Accessed: 17 January 2017]. Martinelli, G., Lau, A. (2014, May 27). Challenging the farm work exclusions in the employment standards code. Retrieved on January 17, 2017, from https://ablawg.ca/, https://ablawg.ca/2014/05/27/challenging-the-farm-work-exclusions-in-the-employment-standards-code/ Workershelp. (2017). Employment and labour standards. Retrieved on January 17, 2017, from https://www.workershelp.ca/, https://www.workershelp.ca/employmentstandards.asp

Pride and Prejudice Essay Example Essay Example

Pride and Prejudice Essay Example Paper Pride and Prejudice Essay Introduction Marriage As A Social Contract In Jane Austen’s ‘Pride And Prejudice’ â€Å". It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife†. With these famous words, Jane Austen launched into what has come to be regarded by many as the greatest romance novel of all time. Written in late 1790’s England, in a time of radical social upheaval and political change, ‘Pride and Prejudice’ presents a mixed bag of social ideas relating to marriage, the meaning of femininity, love and the fluidity of class structure. The time of writing put ‘Pride and Prejudice’ in the middle of a fictional war of ideas between female writers of the time, arriving as it does at a sort of middle ground between the feminist views of Mary Wollstonecraft and the more rural traditionalist views of Hannah More (Jones, V. , ‘Introduction to â€Å"Pride and Prejudice†Ã¢â‚¬â„¢, (1996) London: Penguin). This lead to much confusion among critics as to exactly what Austen’s views regarding marriage and feminism were, and in many cases continues to do so today. In this essay I will attempt to clear up some of this ambiguity, while closely examining the idea of marriage itself, the nature of the ‘social contract’, and the social and historical background to the idea of marriage as a social contract In ‘The Sadeian Woman’, Angela Carter states that â€Å"The marriage bed is a particularly delusive refuge from the world, because all wives of necessity by contract† (Carter, Angela, ‘The Sadeian Woman’, pg. 9, (1978) ). Unfortunately for Ms. Elizabeth Bennet, it cannot be denied that she is a â€Å"wife of necessity†. Pride and Prejudice Essay Body Paragraphs Effectively disinherited through the fine print of their father’s will, the Bennet girls and their neurotic mother are to become penniless on the death of Mr. Bennet, unless they can find themselves a rich husband. Elizabeth’s initial disapproval of Mr. Darcy and his pride seems to undergo a radical upheaval on her visit to Pemberley, Darcy’s ancestral estate, as she herself admits – when discussing with her sister the progress of her feeling’s for Mr. Darcy, she states â€Å"I believe it must date from my first seeing his beautiful grounds at Pemberley† (p301). Certain critics have therefore claimed that Elizabeth Bennet is mercenary in her reasons for marriage to Mr. Darcy. This apparently gold-digging behaviour would suggest an attempt by Elizabeth not only to retain, but also to improve, her class status, and therefore to fall in line with rural traditionalism as laid out in Edmund Burke’s ‘Reflections on the Revolution in Fr ance’. As Elizabeth Bennet is Austen’s heroine, and therefore a character of whom she writes very favourably, it could be supposed that Austen’s attitude towards marriage, and the position of women in society, in writing this book was one of traditional rural conservatism. However, before we can accept this supposition, we must recall that Elizabeth has already turned down two well-off potential husbands – one of them being Mr. Darcy himself! – in an attempt to hold out for true love and personal happiness. Her disgust at the proposal of the unbelievably boring and rude Mr. Collins was surpassed only by her shock at discovering that her best friend, Charlotte Lucas, had consented to marry him instead. Unabashedly mercenary, Ms. Lucas declares that marriage is a woman’s â€Å"pleasantest preservative from want† but that it is â€Å"uncertain of giving happiness† (p. 03) (Jones, V. , etc). Elizabeth, on the other hand, claims to believe in marriage for love, and holds her own individual happiness as a personal goal. This portrayal of the heroine as a creature of emotion and feeling, as opposed to a rational, logical and slightly more masculine figure, would assume Austen to be in favour of the theories of such feminist thinkers of the time as Mary Wollstonecraft – a staunch opposer of the writings of Edmund Burke. What, then, is Austen’s stance towards marriage as seen in ‘Pride and Prejudice’? Is she a romantic feminist or a rural traditionalist? My personal belief is that Austen is neither – I would suggest that she, in fact, manages to reach a happy compromise between the two. Austen clearly applauds Elizabeth Bennet’s Wollstonecraftian behaviour in rushing across the countryside to Netherfield to take care of her sister Jane in her illness as she describes Elizabeth’s appearance afterwards in very favourable terms, and highlights how it contributes to Darc y’s growing attraction to her, mentioning â€Å"the brilliancy which exercise had given to her complexion† (p. 0). However, it is also apparent that Austen is in support of the traditional Burkean notion of family and marriage, as the novel finishes with both Jane and Elizabeth happily and prosperously married to men who are their social betters. Both women marry above themselves and secure financial and social stability for both themselves and their families, thus falling in line with what would have been expected of well-brought up young rural ladies. Austen’s achievement in writing ‘Pride and Prejudice’ was, therefore, to show that Wollstonecraftian femininity could exist alongside and within the rural traditionalist ideals of Edmund Burke. Marriage in the time of Jane Austen was neither a religious sacrament (as the predominant English religion of the time, and Austen’s religion, Anglicanism, did not view marriage as a sacrament) nor a sy mbol of romantic love. In Enlightenment England, marriage was rather a necessity, the ultimate aim of all self-respecting young women. Women were, from birth, trained for their inevitable final position as a mother, wife, chef, and household head. Education was not about schooling in the ways and knowledge of the world, but rather the acquisition of a rich store of ‘accomplishments’ – painting, musical talent, singing, embroidery – essentially the marketable skills of a desirable, and socially respectable, wife. Not only was marriage expected by men to be the desire of all women, but it was also, in fact, a means to an end. Women married to secure their status in society and often to improve their social standing, or ‘move up a rung’ in the all-pervading class hierarchy of the era. ‘Pride And Prejudice’ was no exception to this rule. Take the most obvious examples of Elizabeth and Jane Bennet. On a first glance, these women marry for love and for happiness – ‘Pride And Prejudice’ is clearly a classic romance novel. However, constantly bubbling away on the backburner is the undeniable reality of the Bennets’ impending impoverishment, should they fail to secure rich husbands. Effectively disinherited by the fine print of their father’s will, the future of their whole family is staked on their choice of suitors, now that they have reached marriageable age – as is reflected very effectively by Mrs. Bennet’s neuroticism! Aside from the personal difficulties of the Bennet family, there lies in the background of ‘Pride And Prejudice’ the grim historical reality of the time. 1790’s England was a time of â€Å"political crisis and social mobility† (Jones, V. etc), a time when the stability and power of the rural ruling class was threatened by the upwardly mobile ‘nouveau riche’ merchant class and the increasingly outspoken and dem anding working class. Marriage, family – these were seen as social institutions, traditions essential for the preservation of the supremacy of the ruling gentry that the Darcys, the Bingleys, and to a lesser extent the Bennets. Marriage was, for the members of this class, a means of preserving their social position, protecting the integrity of the class structure, and upholding the rural traditions essential for their survival. When we say then that marriage in Jane Austen’s ‘Pride And Prejudice’ can be viewed as being a kind of social contract, we mean in so far as it enabled the women of the time to amass fortune and social respect, and allowed their men to protect the ruling culture which was threatened at this time by outside political influences. Marriage was a mutually beneficial agreement between the man and the woman – in exchange for the woman’s inheritance (if any), body, and the social respectability and support of the rural tradit ions that possession of an ‘accomplished’ wife offered, the man gave financial support and social status. This leads to charges of marriage being akin to â€Å"legal prostitution† (Wollstonecraft, Mary: A Vindication of The Rights of Woman) – women were seen by some as selling their bodies for societal betterment. Mr. Darcy is naturally the object of the mercenary desires of the women of Pemberley, as he is rumoured to be in receipt of a fortune of ten thousand pounds a year – it has been said by some commentators that Elizabeth Bennet merely falls prey to these mercenary desires, and engages in a marriage as a social contract, using romantic love as an excuse, not a reason, for unity with Darcy. I must disagree – I feel this argument has a critical flaw, in so far as Elizabeth not only turns down Darcy at his first proposal, while being fully aware of his riches (although perhaps not yet confronted with all the glory of Pemberley), but also refuses the advances of the well-off, yet exceedingly boring, Mr. Collins. If Elizabeth Bennet were purely mercenary in her designs, why then would she turn down two apparently suitable matches in an attempt to hold out for her goal of personal happiness? How then can we summarise the view of marriage as a social contract in ‘Pride And Prejudice’? Firstly, I think it is important to note that Austen did not set out to write a feminist text, denouncing the marital and romantic traditions of the ruling class. Her heroine, Elizabeth Bennet, does finally settle down with a man who would have been viewed in anybody’s eyes as being a most suitable and socially acceptable match for her. Darcy provides wealth, respect, security, and an elevated position in society – all of which were the most desirable attributes for a prospective husband of the era. However, the novel is not entirely traditionalist, praising as it does the actions of a heroine who defies her moth er in order to please herself long-term, who engages in plenty of outdoor activity usually viewed as unbecoming to a young lady of status, and who openly speaks her mind regarding the behaviour of Mr. Darcy. As I stated earlier, Austen seems to come to a happy compromise between Wollstonecraftian feminism and the staunch traditionalism of such writers as Hannah More. Similarly, Austen appears to compromise between two marital viewpoints – that which would view marriage purely as a social contract, a means to an end, and that which would promote a more romantic version of marital unity. Marriage as a social contract is, then, rampant in ‘Pride And Prejudice’ – we can see it clearly in the marriage of Charlotte Lucas to Mr. Collins – and could be seen as being something of a necessity to young women, to preserve their social standing. However, it is clear that Austen does not neglect a romantic viewpoint, presenting as she does two beautiful young wom en who are both madly in love with their chosen husbands . References: Austen, Jane, ‘Pride And Prejudice’, (1813) Burke, Edmund, ‘Reflections on The Revolution in France’, (1790) Carter, Angela, ‘The Sadeian Woman’, (1978) Jones, V. , ‘Introduction to â€Å"Pride And Prejudice†Ã¢â‚¬â„¢, (1996), London: Penguin Classics Wollstonecraft, Mary, ‘A Vindication of The Rights of Woman’, (1792) We will write a custom essay sample on Pride and Prejudice Essay Example specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Pride and Prejudice Essay Example specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Pride and Prejudice Essay Example specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer